Lessons from Cyclone Larry Lessons from Cyclone Larry Lessons from Cyclone Larry Lessons from Cyclone Larry
HomeSite Map
Friday, 13, 2009
Lessons from Cyclone Larry
Lessons from Cyclone Larry
Home
home insurance
Lessons from Cyclone Larry
Lessons from Cyclone Larry
Lessons from Cyclone Larry
Lessons from Cyclone Larry
Lessons from Cyclone Larry Lessons from Cyclone Larry
Lessons from Cyclone Larry
Making home insurance better

Lessons from Cyclone Larry


In March 2006 Tropical Cyclone Larry devastated the towns of Innisfail and Babinda on the Queensland north coast. Our review of preliminary information available after the cyclone identified the following issues:

  • Preliminary estimates from some of the insurers surveyed indicated that at least 50% of homes were underinsured.


  • Insurers surveyed estimated that building costs increased by at least 50% immediately after the disaster.


  • Many older homes did not comply with anti-cyclone building code requirements introduced after Cyclone Tracy. This had two effects: the sum insured may not have taken into account the extra building costs associated with meeting these standards and the house was more likely to be a total loss after a cyclone.

Preliminary indications are that most insurers did not take a strict approach to paying claims, and in many cases settled claims for amounts greater than the policy allowed. Government also provided financial assistance. Consumers cannot expect that financial support from insurers and government for a failure to be properly insured will always be forthcoming. These lessons will be reviewed and reconsidered as further information becomes available.

Conclusion

Since the 2005 report, most insurers have taken some positive steps to help consumers reduce the problem of underinsurance. Those steps include:

  • developing new products, in particular total replacement policies which ensure consumers are adequately covered-if their home is accidentally destroyed their insurance will pay to rebuild it,


  • improving calculators, and


  • promoting better education initiatives.

We encourage further measures be undertaken such as:

  • investigating whether total replacement and extended replacement policies can be more widely available and commercially viable, and


  • educating consumers about underinsurance and the availability of web-based calculators.

Most insurers have taken steps to improve the tools available to consumers and help address the risks of underinsurance. However, consumers also have a responsibility in reducing the risk of underinsurance via the type of insurance they purchase and, where relevant, by using the available tools to select the appropriate level of cover.

Why consumers are underinsured

What we found in 2005

The 2005 report identified the following reasons for underinsurance:

  • Most home building insurance policies in Australia are 'sum insured policies.' These policies require the consumer to nominate a specified figure (based on an estimate of rebuilding costs) on the amount that will be paid out in the event of a total loss.


  • Estimating rebuilding costs can be a difficult task, requiring expert or technical assistance. However, nearly all standard home building policies placed the onus on the consumer to calculate these costs and carry the risk of getting it wrong.


  • Consumers generally relied on their insurer for help in estimating rebuilding costs. However, only a small number of insurers provided consumers with reliable tools for estimating the cost of rebuilding their home.


  • Consumers might overlook the need to increase the sum insured over time to keep up with changes in building costs generally, or because of specific increases in rebuilding costs. Rebuilding costs can be significantly increased by:


  • new or enhanced building code requirements, and


  • renovations to the insured's home.


  • Insurers increase the sum insured annually. Our 2005 report found that insurers used three different measurements to increase the sum insured under their policies: the consumer price index (CPI), the house building index (HBI) and a specialist building cost index (known as CHIP). Between March 2000 and March 2005, the HBI increased by 12%, the CPI by 17%, and CHIP by 33%. If CHIP can be seen as a more precise measure then a consumer will become underinsured if the level of cover is only increased by the HBI or CPI.


  • Even if a consumer correctly estimates what it would cost to rebuild their home in a one off total loss, it is almost impossible to know what it will cost to rebuild a home that is destroyed in a mass disaster. The surge in building prices that occurs after a mass disaster can be very unpredictable.


  • Insurers adopted different definitions of the sum insured. This figure may or may not include additional costs (such as demolition costs) and the consumer might not always realise that they may have needed a higher level of cover to meet these costs.

Lessons from Cyclone Larry Home Lessons from Cyclone Larry Lessons from Cyclone Larry Lessons from Cyclone Larry Lessons from Cyclone Larry Lessons from Cyclone Larry Lessons from Cyclone Larry    
Lessons from Cyclone Larry
Copyright © 2009
Lessons from Cyclone Larry